🔗 Share this article

In a unprecedented legal move, San Francisco is preparing to launch what is being called the nation's first government lawsuit against major food manufacturers over UPFs. The city asserts that local governments have been shouldering the significant costs of treating diseases linked to the population-wide eating of these companies' products.

The Primary Argument of the Lawsuit

The city's filing, to be submitted in the court system, implicates ten large companies responsible for producing some of the country's most popular food and beverage items. This group reportedly includes everything from breaded chicken pieces and frozen pizzas to crisps and sugary breakfast cereals. Notably, the action also includes products like certain breads and snack bars that are often advertised as "wholesome" options.

The filing charges these companies of engaging in "misleading and unlawful practices" in their promotion and distribution. It states that these tactics breach state laws regarding deceptive trade and community harm. A central claim is that the companies knew their products posed health risks but opted for profit over safety.

"It makes me sick that generations of kids and parents are being duped and buying food that's hardly food at all," remarked the city's top legal official.

Defining Ultra-Processed Foods

Ultra-processed foods are manufactured using industrial processes and contain additives not commonly used in a family pantry. These involve preservatives, taste boosters, artificial colors, and emulsifiers, with little to no unprocessed food content.

Studies suggests that more than 70% of the American diet is consists of foods commonly considered ultra-processed. Alarmingly, young people are estimated to get over 60% of their caloric intake from such foods.

The Proven Health Risks

A comprehensive global research analysis, issued recently, found that eating ultra-processed foods is associated with harm in every major organ system of the body. The analysis linked these foods with an elevated risk of a numerous serious health conditions, including:

• Cancer
• Obesity
• Adult-onset diabetes
• Mental health struggles
• Cardiovascular illness
• Brain function deterioration

The researchers of that report concluded that the proliferation of UPFs is being driven by multinational companies, not individual dietary choices. They described UPFs as a primary driver of a global "chronic disease pandemic" linked to diet, with manufacturers putting profit first above all else.

Ideological Agreement on a Rare Issue

This legal action represents a unusual instance of alignment between the liberal city of San Francisco and the current federal administration. The federal Health and Human Services Secretary has railed against ultra-processed foods, encouraging Americans to reduce their intake on products with excess sugar, sodium, fat, dyes, and chemical preservatives as part of a "Make America Healthy Again" mission.

The city attorney noted that while he disagrees with the administration on many other health topics, the research on ultra-processed foods is "clear-cut." He remarked, "A number of the views of this administration are lacking evidence, but this is an exception. Even a broken clock is right twice a day."

Listed Corporations and Historical Context

The corporations listed in the legal filing reportedly include industry titans such as:

• The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo
• Kraft Heinz Company
• General Mills and Kellogg
• Nestlé USA and Mondelez International
• Post Holdings, Mars Incorporated, and ConAgra Brands

This move builds upon other regulatory steps in California. Earlier this year, the state enacted a bipartisan bill that became the first in the U.S. to provide a statutory definition of ultra-processed foods, laying a foundation for restricting them from schools. The state has also banned specific ingredients, including artificial colors linked to behavioral difficulties in children, within school meals.

The city attorney's office has a track record in securing victories against big business on wellness concerns, including cases against tobacco companies, paint companies, and opioid manufacturers.

The legal challenge will seek monetary restitution for the costs that local governments shoulder for addressing the health of individuals whose wellness has been compromised by the long-term consumption of ultra-processed food.