🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that began as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are compensated to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the UK, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the celebration is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration symbolises how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a educator at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.